Dual Israeli/Palestinian Historical Narrative Textbooks Emphasize Educational Role in Building Peace

March 27th, 2007 Posted by Chris

In Washington, D.C., The American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP) held a briefing on March 23rd at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The briefing was titled “Developing a Dual Israeli-Palestinian Historical Narrative”. Dr. Sami Adwan of Bethlehem University and Dr. Dan Bar-Or of Ben Gurion University presented their experiences as co-directors of the Peace Research Institute in the Middle East (PRIME) in developing and teaching the ‘Dual Historical Narrative’ booklets to their pupils.

Dr. Bar-On began the briefing by discussing the two narratives project. Dr. Bar-On explained that the dual narratives project; working under the auspices of PRIME, “is a joint research project” meant to “facilitate the peace process”. One of the most apparent factors affecting the project was the distinct asymmetry of power between the Israelis and Palestinians. Dr. Bar-On also explained the psychology of each group in the periods of time, pre-Oslo, during the Oslo process and at the outset of the second Intifada.

In an effort to provide security for oneself, the Israelis and Palestinians alike focused on their own narrative while dehumanizing the other and de-legitimizing the other’s narrative. The dual narrative approach attempts to remedy these psychological maladies. However, Dr. Bar-On explained that even the peace process could be risky. The Israelis and Palestinians run the risk of losing their own identity, an identity that is shaped in many ways by defining
their adversary. Thus, the peace process will ultimately serve as a mechanism to redefine oneself.

Dr. Bar-On also suggested that in the current Israeli/Palestinian conflict there is no dual narrative, each group focuses on its own monolithic interpretation. In order to disarm the internalized, personal narratives, Dr. Bar-On asserted that a bottom-up peace process should be utilized. This bottom-up approach empowers the teachers from both sides.

Dr. Adwan began his address by declaring that “the multi-narrative” approach is the way forward. This approach combines both children and adults and works for future generations, or as Dr. Adwan put it, “our children’s children”. The dual narrative textbook provides a chronological narrative from 1900-2000. The textbook, developed by PRIME, has been used many
teachers in Israeli and Palestinian schools.

Dr. Adwan explained that in developing the textbook each side was responsible for its own narrative, but the other side was able to offer suggestions and clarifications, not criticisms. These narratives are not intended to represent full Israeli or Palestinian narratives, however they are meant to give each side exposure to a narrative much different from their own.

Dr. Adwan concluded by explaining that the goal of the project is to go from a conflict to a post-conflict narrative. There must be a mutual level of respect between the Israelis and Palestinians of the other’s narrative and this is a necessary step to any peace process. Although this project began as a bottom-approach to building peace it has evolved into a tool of educational reform that can be applied to other conflicts. Dr. Adwan ended his address by saying that the dual narrative approach was meant “For our children’s children to humanize each other, live in peace and to put an end to the gridlocked peace process”.

Entry Filed under: Online Community, Campus News

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Contact Info

info@janip.net
114 W. 26th St. Suite #1002
New York, NY 10001

About JANIP

JANIP supports a negotiated two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, based on an end to occupation and the right of both peoples to self-determination within recognized, secure borders. As scholars and teachers who are committed to Israel, we seek to inject a voice of realism and moderation into the on-campus debate, which too often has been reduced to a choice between uncompromisingly pro-Israel vs. pro-Palestinian positions.

Most Recent Posts